top of page

Can You Buy a Storage Unit with Your SMSF? The New Rules Explained

Sep 14
5 min read

You can, and plenty of funds do. What changed recently is the question that decides it.

For years, the barrier was money. Trustees asked whether the fund was big enough, and for most, the answer was no. Since August 2026, the first question is different and more specific: what is the unit actually used for?


Can you buy a storage unit with your SMSF?

An SMSF can buy a storage unit. The sticking point is not the asset type; it is whether the unit qualifies as business real property, which depends on how the occupant uses it. A unit used by a business to hold stock, tools or equipment generally qualifies. A unit holding a household's furniture generally does not.


That distinction used to matter mainly for funds dealing with a related party. Now, it sits at the front of the process for anyone borrowing, which is most buyers.


What changed in August 2026?

From 10 August 2026, a new limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA) has to be over business real property. The route that let a fund borrow to use your SMSF to buy property of a residential kind closed for new arrangements, and existing ones were left in place.


Most of the coverage at the time framed this as a residential property story, which it was. The part that got less attention is what it does to everything in between. A storage unit is clearly not residential, so it survives the change. But surviving the change is not the same as passing the test, and a storage unit doesn't pass automatically. It has to earn the classification through how it is used.


That is a meaningful shift in sequence. Previously, a trustee worked out the money first and sorted the compliance detail later. Now, the use question sits ahead of the finance question, as it decides whether there is a deal to finance.


The test is about use, not about the building.

Business real property means land and buildings used wholly and exclusively in one or more businesses. The business does not have to be yours. A warehouse let to an unrelated manufacturer qualifies on the same footing as premises your own company occupies.


The ATO's ruling on this accepts that minor or incidental non-business use does not break the test. What it does not accommodate is a real, ongoing non-business use sitting alongside the business one. For storage, that is the whole ballgame, because the same bay in the same building can land on either side depending on who rents it and why.

It is an unusual position for an asset class to be in. With a shopfront or a consulting suite, the use is obvious from the floor plan. With storage, the building tells you almost nothing.


Four scenarios, four different answers

Who occupies the unit

What it holds

How the test tends to land

Your own business

Stock, tools, equipment, archived records

Generally satisfied, since the use is plainly business use

An unrelated business

Trade stock, inventory, plant

Generally satisfied, because the business need not be yours

A household

Furniture and personal effects between homes

Generally not satisfied, since there is no business use

A facility with a mix of both

Varies lot by lot

Assessed on the individual lot rather than the building

The last row is the one that confuses people. Buying into a facility does not give you the facility's character. Your fund owns a specific lot on a specific title, and that lot is assessed on its own occupant.


This is also why a trustee looking to buy a storage unit for their business tends to have the simpler path. When your own company occupies the bay and stores its own stock there, the business use is not in question. The lease still has to be properly documented at market rent, as any related party lease does, but the threshold question answers itself.

What happens if the tenant changes

Here is the part that rarely gets discussed, and it is worth raising with your accountant before you buy rather than after.


Business real property status is assessed at a point in time. A unit can satisfy the test on the day your fund acquires it and look different three years later, because the tenant moved out and the next one is storing a caravan and some boxes.


Where your own business is the tenant, this matters directly. The exemption that lets a fund lease to a related party rests on the property being business real property, so a change in how it is used is not a paperwork issue. Where the tenant is unrelated, the position is less exposed, but it is still worth knowing how your fund intends to keep track of it.


The practical answer is usually a lease that specifies permitted use, and a habit of asking the question at each renewal rather than at audit time.


If the fund isn't borrowing, the rules work differently.

The August change applies to borrowing. It governs what a fund can acquire under a new limited recourse borrowing arrangement.


A fund buying outright, with no loan involved, doesn't pass through that particular gate. The other rules still apply in full, including the sole purpose test, and business real property still matters if the fund is buying from a related party or leasing to one. But a cash purchase from an unrelated vendor, let to an unrelated tenant, sits in a different position from a borrowed one.


That's worth knowing, because it occasionally changes the shape of the strategy. A fund that is close to affording a unit outright may find the simpler route is to wait rather than borrow. That is a conversation for your accountant and adviser, since it depends on liquidity and the fund's investment strategy as much as anything.


One thing that has not changed

You cannot store your own things in it.


The fund exists to provide retirement benefits, and using fund property for personal purposes breaches the sole purpose test. Putting the family's camping gear in a corner of a unit the fund owns is not a small liberty. It can also undercut the unit's status as business real property, which puts the borrowing arrangement at risk alongside everything else.


If trustees intend to buy storage units in more than one lot, the same principle applies to each, and each separate title generally needs its own arrangement.


Where that leaves you

The honest summary of buying storage units inside a fund is that it is more available than it was, yet more conditional than it looks. The price point has opened the door for funds that were never going to afford a warehouse. The use test decides whether any particular unit walks through it.


If you are weighing one up, the order that saves money is: check what the unit will be used for, then check what your fund can support, then sign something. Doing it the other way round is how deposits get stuck.


We can help with the middle part. Call 1300 781 680 or book a free SMSF finance session to talk through your fund's position and what an SMSF storage unit loan could look like for you. No fees, no charges, no obligation.


This article is general information only. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs, and it is not tax, legal or financial advice. Superannuation rules and lender policies change, and the application of the business real property test depends on the facts of each case. Speak with your accountant and a licensed financial adviser before acting.


SMSF Loan Experts Melbourne Office

Level 1, 54 Davis Avenue
South Yarra VICTORIA 3141

SMSF Loan Experts Sydney Office

Level 4, 220 George St.
Sydney NSW 2000

bottom of page